Asrock Z77M

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77M (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120713
Uptime	10.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '22 at 11:44
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	30%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 77.2 1-Core 87.5 2-Core 168 65% 111 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 303 40% 299 Pts	64-Core 315 20% 315 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.48 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Lighting 42.6 Reflection 42.6 Parallax 40.1 35% 41.8 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 43.3 Splatting 28.2 29% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: P181106a SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 140 177 145 176 136 MB/s Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.6% Average	Read 219 Write 121 Mixed 156 SusWrite 144 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 19.2 70% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 92.2 DQ Write 20.9 DQ Mixed 30.8 29% 48 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 101%
Adata SU630 960GB 3,578 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 691GB free Firmware: V8X01c89 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 195 208 219 218 216 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.4% Above average	Read 231 Write 196 Mixed 196 SusWrite 205 47% 207 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 41.6 4K Mixed 22.1 74% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 182 133% 173 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HB5N-CG 2x8GB 332 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	48% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.5 48% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 14.8 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 85.9 47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77M Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z77M

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	21x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	9x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	8x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	7x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	7x

SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	5x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	4x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	4x
99U5403-166.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 92 samples	4x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $334

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16