Asrock Z77M

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77M (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120713
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '22 at 05:32
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	83%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 79.1 1-Core 90 2-Core 178 67% 116 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 316 43% 318 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.48 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Lighting 43.1 Reflection 42.5 Parallax 40.2 35% 41.9 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 43.9 Splatting 28.5 29% 36.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: P181106a SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 108 138 116 121 130 MB/s Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.6% Average	Read 248 Write 193 Mixed 182 SusWrite 124 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 54.2 4K Mixed 22 86% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 94.8 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 115 92% 127 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 101%
Adata SU630 960GB 3,578 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 691GB free Firmware: V8X01c89 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 209 214 222 224 223 MB/s Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58% Above average	Read 245 Write 210 Mixed 206 SusWrite 212 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 25.8 88% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 185 136% 178 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HB5N-CG 2x8GB 332 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	50.2% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 16.2 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 15.6 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 82.2 49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77M Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z77M

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	20x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	9x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	8x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	7x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	7x

SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	5x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $50Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	4x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	4x
99U5403-166.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 92 samples	4x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $334

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16