AMD Chausie-MDN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAMD Chausie-MDN  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Chausie-MDN
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '22 at 08:16
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Eng Sample: 100-000000770-40_Y
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.1% Above average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 231
74% 137 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 515
48% 398 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.28
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.53% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 10.7
5% 9.63 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.53%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ymtc PC210-256GB-B 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: YM015215
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1044 985 600 287 295 289 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 844
Write 1123
Mixed 635
SusWrite 583
180% 796 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 50.7
134% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 687
DQ Write 802
DQ Mixed 386
390% 625 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 146%
Great: 201%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MT62F2G32D8DR-031 WT 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 27.6
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 23.3
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Chausie-MDN Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: AMD Chausie-MDN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback