Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3520 2,090 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Memory 37.9 1-Core 17.6 2-Core 23.2 19% 26.2 Pts	4-Core 38.2 8-Core 41.6 5% 39.9 Pts	64-Core 27.5 2% 27.5 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0845) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.54% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 0.7 0% 0.63 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.1 1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.54% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3501103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 6.4 95 140 140 150 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.4% Poor	Read 40.6 Write 58.4 Mixed 114 SusWrite 110 18% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 13 4K Mixed 6.5 25% 8.73 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 83 DQ Mixed 90.2 70% 95.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 1x8GB 7,765 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10.4% Very poor	MC Read 2.9 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.67 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 1.1 5% 1.6 GB/s	Latency 212 19% 212 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N2920IntelBench 31%, 1,586 samples	13x
Pentium N3520IntelBench 34%, 2,090 samples	8x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	21x

RAM
ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 7,765 samples	9x
HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 3,182 samples	4x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	2x

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $130

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16