Huawei MateBook X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemHuawei MateBook X  (all builds)
MotherboardHUAWEI HUAWEI MateBook X
Memory0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2160 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170623
Uptime13.2 Days
Run DateOct 07 '22 at 12:57
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 93%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 57.4
1-Core 36
2-Core 55.4
34% 49.6 Pts
4-Core 97.9
8-Core 118
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Device(19E5 3E02) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 3.7
3% 3.63 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.7
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ2LZ512HMLH-00000 512GB
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXY7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 237 383 394 407 423 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.8% Excellent
Read 609
Write 640
Mixed 292
SusWrite 350
106% 473 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 32.3
4K Mixed 25.8
86% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 423
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 258
202% 285 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 164%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT52L512M64D4PQ-10 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 1.2
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MateBook X Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Huawei MateBook X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback