TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8054
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '22 at 18:49
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$133
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 184
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 370
46% 351 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 66.6%
 Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8054) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 7.6
6% 7.03 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 0.1
4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 5%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 512G 512GB
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 40101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 288 354 351 400 418 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 353
Write 352
Mixed 245
SusWrite 346
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 33.1
109% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 207
193% 299 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 84.6%
 Great: 119%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
931GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 135 132 134 135 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 169
Write 37.2
Mixed 80
SusWrite 131
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 85.9%
 Great: 75%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB
50GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 8.2 6.9 11 9.6 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 66.6
Write 17.8
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 9.4
30% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.6
41% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑
This bench: 13%
 Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5090KB78HAF2133 - [0x9E02] CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB - [0x9E02] CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.6% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 23.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 16.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 69.6%
 Great: 71%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 2,998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel  $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples1,698x
Core i7-6700Intel  $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples832x
Core i5-6600Intel  $133Bench 68%, 80,688 samples229x
GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples1,801x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples214x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples167x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples105x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung  $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples66x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples64x
RAM
HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 2x4GBHynixBench 68%, 8,569 samples104x
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 6,175 samples102x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples76x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback