MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '22 at 18:26
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 49%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$81
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90% Outstanding
Memory 80.2
1-Core 137
2-Core 277
89% 165 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 845
85% 691 Pts
64-Core 1,012
63% 1,012 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.8.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
59.5% Above average
Lighting 75.7
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 104
62% 82.9 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 85.8
Splatting 53.2
55% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1467 225 212 218 201 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 871
Write 1,423
Mixed 1,138
SusWrite 401
217% 958 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 62.1
245% 92.9 MB/s
DQ Read 715
DQ Write 770
DQ Mixed 874
621% 786 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 167%
Great: 299%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
326GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 450 418 460 461 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 472
Write 409
Mixed 409
SusWrite 376
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 20.7
117% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 36.7
90% 181 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 100%
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
13GB free
Firmware: MU02.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 454
Write 439
Mixed 391
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 37.4
144% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 248
210% 304 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 91%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
310GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1245 96 88 105 101 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,260
Write 1285
Mixed 1,059
SusWrite 289
218% 973 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 63.6
252% 92.8 MB/s
DQ Read 687
DQ Write 850
DQ Mixed 275
345% 604 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 179%
Great: 295%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
814GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 182 185 187 185 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 184
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 185
102% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
175% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
643GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 96 94 94 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 101
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 94.1
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 36
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 34.2
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 33.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550-A PRO (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 9,651 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback