MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '22 at 16:11
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$81
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 81.6
1-Core 140
2-Core 279
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 843
85% 691 Pts
64-Core 1,050
65% 1,050 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.8.2
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Lighting 76.1
Reflection 69
Parallax 104
62% 83 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 85.8
Splatting 53.2
55% 69.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 651 96 156 220 218 216 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 854
Write 1,410
Mixed 1,235
SusWrite 260
213% 940 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 77.2
270% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 716
DQ Write 799
DQ Mixed 871
624% 795 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 167%
Great: 299%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
326GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 306 449 465 470 471 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 450
Write 46.7
Mixed 46
SusWrite 368
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 1
40% 99.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 100%
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
11GB free
Firmware: MU02.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 394
Write 359
Mixed 296
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 38.2
115% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 250
210% 304 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 91%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
301GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1111 21 4.3 4.3 4.6 4.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,501
Write 1,484
Mixed 1,122
SusWrite 192
240% 1,075 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 70.2
266% 97.4 MB/s
DQ Read 684
DQ Write 862
DQ Mixed 274
345% 606 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 188%
Great: 295%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
815GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 145 164 153 173 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 172
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 159
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
649GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 94 92 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 84.3
Write 96.9
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 93.2
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 34.1
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 33.7
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550-A PRO (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 9,651 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback