Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4000 14,024 User benchmarks, average bench 24% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Memory 27.7 1-Core 52.8 2-Core 90.4 31% 57 Pts	4-Core 93.2 8-Core 91.5 12% 92.3 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 1254) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.5% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 1.3 0% 0.97 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 1 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.5% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TEAM T2535T120G 120GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 45GB free (System drive), PID 1066 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 24 22 24 23 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 34 Write 35.7 Mixed 38.1 SusWrite 24.8 45% 33.1 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 8.3 341% 7.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 142%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.99% Terrible	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.23 GB/s	Latency 269 15% 269 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 7.99% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium Silver N5000IntelBench 34%, 12,140 samples	72x
Celeron N4000IntelBench 24%, 14,024 samples	62x
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	8x

GPU
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	72x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	71x

RAM
1x4GBHynixBench 19%, 8,928 samples	58x
1x4GBMicronBench 22%, 5,693 samples	28x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 38,499 samples	6x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16