Positivo POS-PIQ77CL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo POS-PIQ77CL  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-PIQ77CL
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130208
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateOct 06 '22 at 14:23
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 180
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 298
40% 298 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Device(1B0A 0152) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 120GB 120GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0805
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 112 122 130 108 129 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.5% Average
Read 229
Write 121
Mixed 137
SusWrite 121
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 24.6
85% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.6
DQ Write 88.4
DQ Mixed 36.9
34% 51.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 86%
WD WD2500YS-18SHB1 250GB
133GB free
Firmware: 20.06C07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 55 55 56 55 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 57.1
Write 49.5
Mixed 43.3
SusWrite 54.4
38% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564128FH8N0QNSCR 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.2
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 15
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-PIQ77CL Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-PIQ77CL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback