Acer Aspire TC-105

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-105  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-105
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130805
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateOct 29 '17 at 04:03
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 136
58% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 211
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8470
Sapphire(174B 8145) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.15% Terrible
Lighting 2.87
Reflection 2.88
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.75 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.15%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 150
Write 127
Mixed 126
101% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.19
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 0.32
131% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G ACR16D3LU1NGG/2G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.1% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-105 Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $214
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback