Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive351% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory16.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '22 at 01:21
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$309
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 82.4
1-Core 208
2-Core 406
121% 232 Pts
4-Core 779
8-Core 1,458
134% 1,119 Pts
64-Core 2,830
175% 2,830 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 114%
Great: 126%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$96
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1673 1653 1458 1475 1394 1094 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
351% Outstanding
Read 2,466
Write 1,954
Mixed 1,686
SusWrite 1,458
423% 1,891 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 89.1
296% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,811
DQ Write 1,415
DQ Mixed 1,575
1,189% 1,600 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 351%
Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
465GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 248 248 247 248 247 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
83.8% Excellent
Read 258
Write 246
Mixed 236
SusWrite 247
56% 247 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 48.8
160% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 190
142% 190 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
158GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 81.3
Write 81.9
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 58
51% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3040F16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
167% Outstanding
MC Read 63.8
MC Write 59.4
MC Mixed 57.9
172% 60.4 GB/s
SC Read 49.7
SC Write 65.5
SC Mixed 57.9
165% 57.7 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 146%
This bench: 167%
Great: 210%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 348 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 417%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $2,298
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback