Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 114% UFO	Workstation 99% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	71.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 17 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI (all builds)
Memory	15.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220819
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '22 at 23:25
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$394 2,844 User benchmarks, average bench 116% AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Memory 84.5 1-Core 207 2-Core 405 121% 232 Pts	4-Core 772 8-Core 1393 130% 1,083 Pts	64-Core 2,630 163% 2,630 Pts
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 126%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% EVGA(3842 3897) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 517.48 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	71.8% Very good	Lighting 93.9 Reflection 132 Parallax 89.8 76% 105 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 78.9 Splatting 55.9 63% 79.9 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 574 572 573 572 575 570 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	172% Outstanding	Read 639 Write 542 Mixed 607 SusWrite 573 133% 590 MB/s	4K Read 56.8 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 80.2 258% 89.5 MB/s	DQ Read 767 DQ Write 626 DQ Mixed 1,148 737% 847 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 172% Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 465GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 463 465 469 465 465 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 461 Mixed 397 SusWrite 465 102% 451 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 56.7 187% 65.9 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 359 DQ Mixed 367 276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 134%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 158GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 90 88 90 89 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 79.7 Write 80.8 Mixed 60.4 SusWrite 88.8 57% 77.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F5-6000J3040F16G 2x16GB 1,701 User benchmarks, average bench 180% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	164% Outstanding	MC Read 63.3 MC Write 56.9 MC Mixed 58.3 170% 59.5 GB/s	SC Read 49.2 SC Write 60.3 SC Mixed 50.9 153% 53.5 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 146% ↑ This bench: 164% Great: 210%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 413%

UFO

Desktop 117%

UFO

Workstation 417%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

CPU
Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD $380Bench 117%, 4,023 samples	119x
Ryzen 7 7700XAMD $279Bench 112%, 4,548 samples	55x
Ryzen 9 7950XAMD $549Bench 114%, 3,143 samples	52x

GPU
RTX 4090Nvidia $1,800Bench 370%, 25,956 samples	60x
RTX 4070-TiNvidia $651Bench 240%, 46,082 samples	45x
RTX 4080Nvidia $720Bench 290%, 22,998 samples	33x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	44x
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $189Bench 460%, 45,230 samples	23x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	19x

RAM
F5-6000J3038F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 190%, 9,902 samples	22x
KF560C36-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 178%, 10,381 samples	20x
F5-6000J3238F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 176%, 6,345 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $2,348

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16