| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 97.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO C700 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3064-A1 |
| Memory | 1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110729 |
| Uptime | 2.8 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 05 '22 at 10:07 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | SVK-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57%
Above average
|
54% 84 Pts
|
24% 181 Pts
|
12% 187 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11B9) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
0.65%
Terrible
|
0% 0.83 fps
|
1% 1.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$77
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 385 405 410 386 345 MB/s
|
97.8%
Outstanding
|
92% 409 MB/s
|
133% 44.3 MB/s
|
241% 325 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
386GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 25 25 24 MB/s
|
13.9%
Very poor
|
36% 30.8 MB/s
|
27% 0.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43.6%
Average
|
43% 15.1 GB/s
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
55% 72.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical ESPRIMO C700 Builds (Compare 59 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO C700
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 14x |
| Core i5-2400SIntel $70Bench 60%, 10,987 samples | 12x |
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 42x |
| RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples | 4x |
| Quadro K420NvidiaBench 3%, 3,707 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $278 |