Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 100 2-Core 195 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 415 48% 372 Pts	64-Core 473 29% 473 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% AMD(1002 A409) ≥ 4GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 667 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	5.08% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 7.7 Parallax 8.9 5% 7.63 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 6.7 Splatting 5.9 5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.08% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teclast 512GB SSD 512GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 397GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS1A30C SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 15 119 134 169 232 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.1% Below average	Read 242 Write 219 Mixed 202 SusWrite 128 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 36.4 4K Mixed 0.2 59% 20.9 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 14.5 DQ Mixed 0.3 17% 44.5 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 334GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 116 112 115 113 115 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 113 Write 115 Mixed 65.7 SusWrite 115 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 17.3 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 17.8 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16