Lenovo 82S9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics64.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 82S9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220406
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateOct 04 '22 at 18:38
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 13%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Memory 71.8
1-Core 181
2-Core 348
104% 200 Pts
4-Core 669
8-Core 1,010
104% 840 Pts
64-Core 1,612
100% 1,612 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3AF6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
64.4% Good
Lighting 86.2
Reflection 78.2
Parallax 74.4
70% 79.6 fps
MRender 73.4
Gravity 62
Splatting 60.7
53% 65.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme UMIS RPJTJ512MGE1QDY 512GB
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.4L0630 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1063 1237 1326 1449 1555 1304 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,315
Write 1,553
Mixed 1,262
SusWrite 1,322
360% 1,613 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 77.1
259% 89.1 MB/s
DQ Read 989
DQ Write 427
DQ Mixed 623
484% 680 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 285%
Great: 314%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
474GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1753 1683 1544 1256 1265 1283 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2082
Write 1,618
Mixed 1395
SusWrite 1464
368% 1,640 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 79.3
259% 89.5 MB/s
DQ Read 986
DQ Write 389
DQ Mixed 696
513% 691 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 284%
Great: 421%
External USB3.0 240GB
164GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 328 360 370 371 370 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 252
Write 334
Mixed 265
SusWrite 348
68% 299 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 21.2
74% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 15.7
41% 87.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE Corsair CMSX8GX4M1A3200C22 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 38.9
118% 41.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 39.4
SC Mixed 26.5
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82S9 Builds (Compare 1,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82S9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback