Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 04 '22 at 17:11
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 154
2-Core 303
101% 184 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 1,050
97% 808 Pts
64-Core 1,102
68% 1,102 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580X
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.8.2
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.1% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 97
54% 77.2 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 70.3
Splatting 48.6
49% 62 fps
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 58%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 916 734 790 743 800 826 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 2,517
Write 2,077
Mixed 1738
SusWrite 801
398% 1,783 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 78.8
258% 86.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,050
DQ Write 618
DQ Mixed 792
601% 820 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 267%
Great: 346%
Intel MEMPEK1W032GA 29GB
22GB free
Firmware: K3110310
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 276 280 274 273 275 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,234
Write 277
Mixed 453
SusWrite 276
122% 560 MB/s
4K Read 197
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 146
546% 152 MB/s
DQ Read 1,088
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 437
385% 600 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 264%
Great: 328%
ST16000NM003G-2KH113 16TB
1TB free
Firmware: SS02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 210 213 210 211 206 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 250
Write 244
Mixed 105
SusWrite 209
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 1
50% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 4.8
DQ Write 7
DQ Mixed 1
2% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 40%
Seagate ST16000NM003G 16TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SS03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 187 186 196 201 204 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 85% Great: 100%
Seagate ST14000DM001-2JC101 14TB
202GB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 151 154 161 163 163 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$115
509GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 90 88 89 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 51.5
Write 85.1
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 88.4
51% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.5
199% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 46.3
MC Mixed 35.3
116% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 49.2
SC Mixed 31.4
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 113%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 30 60 24" 1296 759 BNQ78ED BenQ GL2480
Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 4,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,099
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback