Asus G55VW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemAsus G55VW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G55VW
Memory7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121105
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '17 at 21:02
Run Duration98 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 89
2-Core 173
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 443
46% 373 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660M
Asus(1043 2117) 2GB
CLim: 1085 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.23% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 11.9
8% 10.6 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 13.4
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.23%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
530GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SM12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 88.2
Mixed 93.3
70% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.2
81% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU5-GN-F HMT325S6CFR8C-PB 10GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.3% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 15.6
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G55VW Builds (Compare 166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G55VW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback