Asus G55VW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
CPU throttled at 49% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus G55VW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G55VW
Memory7.8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20121105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '17 at 21:28
Run Duration96 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 49%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 33.3
2-Core 66.9
38% 56.6 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 168
18% 145 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660M
Asus(1043 2117) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 306.14
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
7.99% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 8.27
Parallax 9.47
7% 8.81 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 12.1
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.99%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
534GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SM12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 91.8
Mixed 90.9
70% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.2
79% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU5-GN-F HMT325S6CFR8C-PB 10GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.3% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 9.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G55VW Builds (Compare 166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G55VW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback