Acer Nitro AN515-43

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-43  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Octavia_PKS
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateOct 04 '22 at 06:08
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 175
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 495
47% 390 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 142A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.28
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
44.8% Average
Lighting 58.8
Reflection 63
Parallax 51.9
48% 57.9 fps
MRender 41.7
Gravity 50.4
Splatting 49.2
39% 47.1 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 604 599 566 470 396 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,011
Write 262
Mixed 422
SusWrite 519
122% 553 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 45.1
165% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 636
DQ Write 603
DQ Mixed 479
398% 573 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 150%
Great: 172%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
896GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 113 112 113 111 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 84.7
Write 85.5
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 112
63% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.7
226% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M4S0-8GS1NCRG i-DIMM 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
66.8% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 24.1
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 20.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-43 Builds (Compare 1,712 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback