Acer Nitro AN515-43

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-43  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Octavia_PKS
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 19:13
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 35.7
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 127
42% 77.7 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 390
34% 293 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 142A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.28
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.7% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 43.3
24% 34.4 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 43.3
34% 41 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 539 555 600 585 414 426 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 818
Write 624
Mixed 724
SusWrite 520
151% 671 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 47
152% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 526
DQ Write 406
DQ Mixed 470
350% 467 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 133%
Great: 172%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
726GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 113 107 115 115 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
65% Good
Read 113
Write 101
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 112
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.8
252% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M4S0-8GS1NCRG i-DIMM 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
27.2% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 13.9
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 12.1
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 223
18% 223 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-43 Builds (Compare 1,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback