ADD TO PC
BUILD

Medion Erazer X7843 MD99557

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	40.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago.

System	Medion Erazer X7843 MD99557 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION P670RG1M
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151105
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '22 at 20:27
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Memory 61.7 1-Core 41.1 2-Core 95.5 41% 66.1 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 240 26% 203 Pts	64-Core 282 18% 282 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M 14,160 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Clevo(1558 6780) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.48 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.2% Average	Lighting 49.1 Reflection 55 Parallax 48.6 40% 50.9 fps	MRender 54.6 Gravity 50.8 Splatting 45.4 41% 50.3 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 60%
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) 213,495 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Clevo(1558 6540) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	5.85% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 7.2 Parallax 6.9 5% 6.87 fps	MRender 8.5 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 10 7% 8.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.85% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB 6,038 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT2101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 15 21 21 19 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 59%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 135GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 69 69 66 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 10.7 Write 69.5 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 68.7 31% 42 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.2 51% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB 55,289 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	64.6% Good	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 22 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 20.6 SC Mixed 16.7 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 123 33% 123 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Erazer X7843 MD99557 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer X7843 MD99557

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	6x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	4x
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	2x

SSD
SSD 240GBIntensoBench 74%, 1,366 samples	1x
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	1x
WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GBWDCBench 93%, 43,498 samples	1x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback