Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory123.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '22 at 14:18
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 61.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 233
74% 139 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 929
82% 696 Pts
64-Core 2,279
141% 2,279 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Asus(1043 8728) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 157
Parallax 157
128% 157 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 138
Splatting 120
118% 148 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 120%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1342 652 663 631 656 608 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 2,508
Write 1,863
Mixed 1,451
SusWrite 759
366% 1,645 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 42.6
161% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 806
DQ Write 86.2
DQ Mixed 173
196% 355 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 216%
Great: 340%
SHGS31-500GS-2 500GB
322GB free
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 414 292 262 278 256 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 500
Write 372
Mixed 381
SusWrite 310
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 29.8
99% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 71.3
DQ Mixed 125
117% 190 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 109%
SHGP31-1000GM-2 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 41060C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1699 1821 1796 1745 1706 1419 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 2,601
Write 1,942
Mixed 1,550
SusWrite 1,698
436% 1,948 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 45.4
175% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 836
DQ Write 79.7
DQ Mixed 154
190% 357 MB/s
Poor: 181%
This bench: 281%
Great: 414%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
663GB free
Firmware: 04.05G11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 74 78 73 78 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 78.1
Write 78
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 75.1
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 61%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
784GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 72 68 71 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
40% Average
Read 70
Write 68.4
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 69
48% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40%
Great: 51%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 6998
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.1 4.5 4.3 4.5 4.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 149
Write 2.7
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 4.2
28% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Mixed 0
55% 4.95 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
128% Outstanding
MC Read 51.2
MC Write 53.1
MC Mixed 48.4
145% 50.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 21.9
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 128%
Great: 202%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,079
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback