Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	74.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190125
Uptime	6.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '22 at 13:38
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Memory 75.1 1-Core 105 2-Core 191 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 479 51% 408 Pts	64-Core 821 51% 821 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.3% Very good	Lighting 99.1 Reflection 140 Parallax 86.2 81% 109 fps	MRender 107 Gravity 8.3 Splatting 103 62% 72.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 468 Write 249 Mixed 273 73% 330 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 57.4 4K Mixed 23.4 95% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 206 180% 269 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 523GB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 112 Write 90.7 Mixed 73.3 69% 91.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
FUJITSU MHW2120BH 120GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 89GB free, PID 2339 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 35.6 Write 30.9 Mixed 25.8 38% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56 84,291 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	MC Read 28.8 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 25.8 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 21.9 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 90.2 44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	429x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $170Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	91x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	53x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	79x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	67x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	53x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	55x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $136Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	42x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $1,090

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16