Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	72.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

20 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190125
Uptime	6.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '22 at 13:32
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 77.3 1-Core 99.1 2-Core 198 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 341 8-Core 529 54% 435 Pts	64-Core 801 50% 801 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.3% Very good	Lighting 84.9 Reflection 131 Parallax 81.2 69% 99.2 fps	MRender 95.3 Gravity 96.7 Splatting 95.3 78% 95.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 480 Write 111 Mixed 159 54% 250 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 66.3 4K Mixed 21.7 106% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 132 127% 208 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 523GB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 102 Write 134 Mixed 64.6 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
FUJITSU MHW2120BH 120GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 89GB free, PID 2339 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 35 Write 34 Mixed 23.3 38% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56 84,291 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 24.5 MC Mixed 25.6 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 25 SC Mixed 20 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 85.7 47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	427x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $189Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	91x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	79x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	66x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $75Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	42x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,058

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16