Samsung 930XBE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 930XBE  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT930XBV-A58A
Memory0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210720
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 03 '22 at 13:21
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 77%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 19.3
2-Core 61.6
33% 48.7 Pts
4-Core 80.5
8-Core 164
14% 122 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Sanyo(144D C16B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 3.4
3% 4.03 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 3.1
3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000 256GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD72K1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 175 170 165 155 159 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,821
Write 847
Mixed 829
SusWrite 185
202% 921 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 49.9
147% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 275
200% 265 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 143%
Great: 249%
Samsung J3 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 131 130 120 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 131
Write 136
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 128
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
238% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 19.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 7.2
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 930XBE Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 930XBE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback