Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP ENVY x360 Convertible 15-bq0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8312
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170712
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '17 at 17:53
Run Duration	316 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	87%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR) 14,746 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Memory 61.3 1-Core 66.7 2-Core 107 48% 78.3 Pts	4-Core 105 8-Core 106 14% 105 Pts	64-Core 105 6% 105 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 8312) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	3.54% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 8.27 Parallax 5.59 3% 6.02 fps	MRender 4.05 Gravity 3.97 Splatting 5.43 4% 4.48 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.54% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 23,829 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5KHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	91% Outstanding	Read 641 Write 531 Mixed 439 119% 537 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 55.7 4K Mixed 21.2 103% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 35.3 DQ Write 69.9 DQ Mixed 23.5 26% 42.9 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 141%
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 1TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 115GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 33.8 Write 28.4 Mixed 36.4 42% 32.9 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 12.9 4K Mixed 8.25 758% 10.4 MB/s	DQ Read 12.1 DQ Write 16.2 DQ Mixed 7.52 851% 11.9 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 90%
hp v150w 32GB 276 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 30GB free, PID 2d40 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	5.29% Terrible	Read 17.4 Write 6.25 Mixed 8.47 12% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.84 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.005 22% 1.95 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.29% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6H1 1x8GB 5,210 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2132 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 8.5 24% 8.53 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 7.7 20% 7.03 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 6,884 samples	12x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	11x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	9x

SSD
SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 10,347 samples	6x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	5x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $50Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	2x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GBSamsungBench 51%, 4,998 samples	5x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBHynixBench 57%, 26,973 samples	4x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	4x