Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11400H 35,470 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 66.3 1-Core 144 2-Core 267 85% 159 Pts	4-Core 486 8-Core 803 79% 645 Pts	64-Core 972 60% 972 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop) 35,839 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Clevo(1558 5015) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1748 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Lighting 98.3 Reflection 84.6 Parallax 43.4 80% 75.4 fps	MRender 78 Gravity 70.4 Splatting 65.3 58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 72%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SX8200PNP-512GT-S 512GB 1,282 User benchmarks, average bench 230% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: 42A4SANA Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,282 Write 1,551 Mixed 209 294% 1,347 MB/s	4K Read 56.6 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 77.8 267% 96.2 MB/s	DQ Read 739 DQ Write 989 DQ Mixed 387 425% 705 MB/s
Poor: 128% Great: 301%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB 38,732 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	87.1% Excellent	MC Read 35.6 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 29.1 93% 32.7 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 35.2 SC Mixed 16.5 64% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 105%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 52%

Yacht

CPU
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples	816x

GPU
RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)NvidiaBench 61%, 35,839 samples	420x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples	395x
Graphics i gfx-driver-ci-master-9938 DCH-IIntelBench 5%, 1 sample	1x

SSD
ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 512GBBench 287%, 1,031 samples	289x
AG4512G-SI B10 512GBGigabyteBench 277%, 1,304 samples	106x
SX8200PNP-512GT-S 512GBBench 230%, 1,282 samples	101x

RAM
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples	253x
AO1P32NC8W1-BDAS 2x8GBAdataBench 70%, 1,014 samples	187x
CT8G4SFS832A.M8FRS 2x8GBCrucialBench 81%, 1,967 samples	73x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16