Samsung 550XDA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSamsung 550XDA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP550XDA-KH2BR
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '22 at 21:45
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 139
2-Core 282
89% 165 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 597
68% 529 Pts
64-Core 605
37% 605 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Sanyo(144D C195) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 22.8
Parallax 23.2
16% 22 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 26.8
Splatting 16.1
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SN530 SDBPNPZ-25 256GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2004 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 85 102 108 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 769
Write 87.1
Mixed 206
SusWrite 101
63% 291 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 11.2
67% 17 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 13.4
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 14.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550XDA Builds (Compare 1,480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 550XDA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback