Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '22 at 18:27
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 145
2-Core 296
97% 178 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 816
81% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,057
65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 8753) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Lighting 96.2
Reflection 91.4
Parallax 87
78% 91.5 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 83.4
Splatting 74
73% 91.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
569GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2059 1071 331 183 240 248 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,745
Write 2,186
Mixed 1,849
SusWrite 689
364% 1,617 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 80.9
269% 95.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,076
DQ Write 810
DQ Mixed 940
704% 942 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 238%
Great: 365%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
72GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 376 376 377 378 363 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 448
Mixed 424
SusWrite 386
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 56.6
187% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 111%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 250GB-$81
232GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 201 196 196 198 196 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 468
Write 423
Mixed 341
SusWrite 232
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 31
102% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 192
147% 199 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 100%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
612GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 155 155 157 156 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 150
Mixed 109
SusWrite 155
108% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 108%
USB3.0 500GB
440GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 73 73 74 72 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 81.4
Write 77.2
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 71.6
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 67%
USB3.0 640GB
118GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 73 73 74 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
43% Average
Read 77
Write 70.3
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 72.7
53% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 36.1
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 30
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 37.2
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,749 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $985
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback