Monster TULPAR T7 V4.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V4.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V4.3
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151221
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateOct 01 '22 at 17:46
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 165
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 479
48% 390 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Clevo(1558 6540) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.24% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 57.3
Parallax 6.5
5% 23.2 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.4
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.24%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
555GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 385 376 393 393 400 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 391
Mixed 318
SusWrite 385
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 30.9
112% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 262
218% 315 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
230GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 286 288 291 292 291 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 420
Write 407
Mixed 348
SusWrite 301
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 42.3
134% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 331
248% 332 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 122%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 406 397 413 418 421 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 397
Mixed 356
SusWrite 406
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 43.6
143% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 338
251% 332 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 102%
Great: 131%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
406GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 83 83 84 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 83.6
Write 67.2
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 82.8
46% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB Kingston 9905744-108.A00G 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.3% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 21.7
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 17
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V4.3 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V4.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback