Default X670E Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 227%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive488% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDefault X670E Taichi  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Taichi
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '22 at 19:09
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$490
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 224
2-Core 437
128% 248 Pts
4-Core 844
8-Core 1,576
144% 1,210 Pts
64-Core 3,146
195% 3,146 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 121%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
PowerColor(148C 2408) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver:
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
191% Outstanding
Lighting 246
Reflection 255
Parallax 506
200% 336 fps
MRender 384
Gravity 214
Splatting 292
240% 296 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 191%
Great: 209%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3185 3178 3196 3198 3196 3194 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
488% Outstanding
Read 2,748
Write 3226
Mixed 3,018
SusWrite 3191
690% 3,046 MB/s
4K Read 70.7
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 103
343% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,890
DQ Write 1,542
DQ Mixed 1,738
1,296% 1,724 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 488%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3038F16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
185% Outstanding
MC Read 75.5
MC Write 63.3
MC Mixed 66.5
196% 68.4 GB/s
SC Read 53.6
SC Write 58.3
SC Mixed 58.2
162% 56.7 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 146%
This bench: 185%
Great: 238%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X670E Taichi Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 218%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 285%
UFO

System: Default X670E Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,660
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback