Default X670E Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 225%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive491% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDefault X670E Taichi  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Taichi
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '22 at 18:33
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$487
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 83.2
1-Core 222
2-Core 439
128% 248 Pts
4-Core 832
8-Core 1,590
144% 1,211 Pts
64-Core 3,139
194% 3,139 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
PowerColor(148C 2408) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver:
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
192% Outstanding
Lighting 247
Reflection 250
Parallax 508
201% 335 fps
MRender 385
Gravity 214
Splatting 291
241% 297 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 192%
Great: 209%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3186 3188 3198 3198 3193 3196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
491% Outstanding
Read 2,783
Write 3,224
Mixed 3041
SusWrite 3,193
693% 3,060 MB/s
4K Read 70.9
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 104
345% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,908
DQ Write 1,560
DQ Mixed 1,720
1,291% 1,729 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 491%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3038F16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
183% Outstanding
MC Read 73.1
MC Write 62.4
MC Mixed 65.8
192% 67.1 GB/s
SC Read 52
SC Write 65.1
SC Mixed 57.5
166% 58.2 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 146%
This bench: 183%
Great: 238%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X670E Taichi Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 218%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 285%
UFO

System: Default X670E Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,647
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback