PC Orion Colossus II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 153%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 20 months ago.
SystemPC Orion Colossus II  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190424
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 30 '22 at 18:53
Run Duration668 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 146
2-Core 286
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 585
8-Core 1051
98% 818 Pts
64-Core 1,574
97% 1,574 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Zotac(19DA 2503) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
153% Outstanding
Lighting 205
Reflection 198
Parallax 247
167% 217 fps
MRender 260
Gravity 207
Splatting 154
164% 207 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 153%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9001b31 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 574 141 47 15 15 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,922
Write 1,021
Mixed 927
SusWrite 137
220% 1,002 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 50.9
186% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 412
DQ Mixed 582
394% 478 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 161%
Great: 278%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
507GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,635
Write 2,326
Mixed 1,873
507% 2,278 MB/s
4K Read 68.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 77
258% 83.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,184
DQ Write 388
DQ Mixed 631
506% 734 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$40
935GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 164 165 182 172 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 123
Write 110
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 114
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
184% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 106%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 131 129 131 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 128
Write 136
Mixed 71
SusWrite 87.1
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 86%
Seagate Game Drive Xbox 8TB
6.5TB free, PID aa10
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 166 173 170 173 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 146
Write 158
Mixed 93.4
SusWrite 171
194% 142 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.8
198% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GF2400Z16K4 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
78.7% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 23.5
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 24.5
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Orion Colossus II Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

System: PC Orion Colossus II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $940
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback