Lenovo 90Q900BSMH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 90Q900BSMH  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 374F
Memory88.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211201
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateSep 30 '22 at 16:13
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900KF-$288
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 76.7
1-Core 174
2-Core 341
104% 197 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 943
94% 766 Pts
64-Core 1,089
67% 1,089 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Legend(17AA C904) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 224
Reflection 212
Parallax 223
183% 220 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 155
Splatting 137
132% 165 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 152%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB
657GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1573 1462 1466 1460 1479 1485 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2,114
Write 2100
Mixed 1,553
SusWrite 1,488
408% 1,814 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 83.6
287% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 472
DQ Write 711
DQ Mixed 873
582% 685 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 291%
Great: 380%
Sandisk Extreme 55AE 2TB
6GB free
Firmware: 3001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 747
Write 756
Mixed 696
164% 733 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 33.1
107% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 216
148% 182 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 82%
Corsair MP600 PRO XT 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: EIFM31.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2157 2452 2312 2304 1915 2094 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 1,930
Write 2167
Mixed 2,247
SusWrite 2,206
484% 2,137 MB/s
4K Read 65.4
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 87.3
299% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,048
DQ Write 372
DQ Mixed 943
636% 788 MB/s
Poor: 270%
This bench: 336%
Great: 633%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW128GX4M4D3600C18 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
61.9% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 20.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 19.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90Q900BSMH Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 154%
UFO

System: Lenovo 90Q900BSMH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $788
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback