PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH P67 (all builds) |
Memory | 7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121101 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Sep 30 '22 at 12:51 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 38% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
67.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.1%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
251GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 85 89 90 97 MB/s
|
55.5%
Above average
|
|||
Hitachi HDT725040VLA380 400GB
350GB free
Firmware: V5COA7EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 62 63 62 63 MB/s
|
33.1%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate BUP Slim BL 1TB
258GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 61 65 59 68 MB/s
|
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52.9%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 580x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 233x |
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 129x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 107x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 101x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 80x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Above average | Total price: $595 |