Asrock Z97M OC Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z97M OC Formula  (all builds)
Memory17.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 30 '22 at 06:46
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 210
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 563
58% 470 Pts
64-Core 611
38% 611 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$120
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.4% Average
Lighting 60.3
Reflection 64.6
Parallax 91.9
49% 72.3 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 73.6
Splatting 49.4
50% 62.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 256GB-$164
93GB free
Firmware: 5.2.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 188 206 189 204 183 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 364
Write 262
Mixed 269
SusWrite 196
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 28.6
97% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 93.6
DQ Mixed 181
134% 182 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$80
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 206 209 219 199 204 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 443
Write 412
Mixed 347
SusWrite 217
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 25.3
87% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 86.8
DQ Mixed 142
128% 201 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 116%
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67
110GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 292 291 290 332 324 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 464
Write 394
Mixed 352
SusWrite 300
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 31.2
109% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 83.1
DQ Mixed 144
128% 202 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 117%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
88GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 292 291 290 331 325 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 470
Write 414
Mixed 352
SusWrite 299
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 31.7
110% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 76.9
DQ Mixed 139
125% 198 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 117%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
2TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 115 114 109 118 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 123
Write 125
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 113
144% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2133C11-8GXL 0420 F3-2133C11-8GXL 0420 F3-2133C10-4GXM 0420 F3-2133C10-4GXM 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 12.4
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 14.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M OC Formula Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z97M OC Formula - $252

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $775
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback