Asus CM6630_CM6730_CM6830.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus CM6630_CM6730_CM6830.  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6630_CM6730_CM6830.
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110718
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 30 '22 at 01:26
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$191
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 166
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 389
42% 334 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 179
Parallax 172
132% 171 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 171
Splatting 122
113% 140 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 121%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKKB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 115 170 33 33 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 319
Write 308
Mixed 286
SusWrite 71.9
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 31.2
108% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 148
127% 184 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 102%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
237GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 208 212 215 221 221 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.3% Good
Read 222
Write 213
Mixed 211
SusWrite 216
49% 215 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 35.2
114% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 37.1
DQ Write 77.1
DQ Mixed 48.9
40% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 129%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
225GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 110 110 111 110 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 110
72% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
229GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 73 75 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 62
Write 64.5
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 73.9
47% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
236GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 109 112 112 111 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 126
Write 136
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 111
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 76%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
54GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 59 54 58 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 53.2
Write 58
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 57.6
39% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.2
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6630_CM6730_CM6830. Builds (Compare 535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6630_CM6730_CM6830.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $165
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback