HP OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 211%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 234%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8917
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '22 at 02:03
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 95%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$215
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 79.4
1-Core 197
2-Core 398
116% 225 Pts
4-Core 793
8-Core 1391
132% 1,092 Pts
64-Core 2,370
147% 2,370 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$435
HP(103C 88D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 276
Reflection 250
Parallax 285
225% 270 fps
MRender 319
Gravity 232
Splatting 170
189% 241 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 190%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC WD BLACK SDBPNTY-512G-1106 512GB
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1292 995 994 998 1002 1012 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,720
Write 1,903
Mixed 1,579
SusWrite 1,049
352% 1,562 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 60.9
208% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,356
DQ Write 448
DQ Mixed 1,008
716% 937 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 237%
Great: 283%
Nvme WDS200T1XHE-00AFY0 2TB
222GB free
Firmware: 614900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2839 2642 859 842 859 859 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
369% Outstanding
Read 3,356
Write 2,638
Mixed 2,213
SusWrite 1,483
541% 2,422 MB/s
4K Read 66.6
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 88.3
315% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,554
DQ Write 542
DQ Mixed 1,107
802% 1,068 MB/s
Poor: 305%
This bench: 369%
Great: 655%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
693GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 158 161 156 157 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 161
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 158
93% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$89
598GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 117 120 118 121 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 60.7
Write 68.6
Mixed 44.4
SusWrite 120
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3733C19D4/16GX HP37D4U1S8MR-8XR HP37D4U1S8MR-8XR 32GB
2400, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.9% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 27.1
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 27.7
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx Builds (Compare 1,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $650
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback