Asus H110-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H110-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '22 at 16:25
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 189
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 354
47% 350 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 34.9
Reflection 41.4
Parallax 37.9
28% 38.1 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 28.2
28% 35.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gloway FER120GS3-S7 120GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1204B0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 435
Write 330
Mixed 314
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.2
37% 8.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 94%
P3-512 512GB
273GB free
Firmware: T0724A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 386 393 408 407 417 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 450
Write 345
Mixed 308
SusWrite 397
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 25.1
122% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 42.7
83% 162 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 104%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
78GB free
Firmware: CP100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 68 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 112
Write 22.4
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 68.9
43% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 43%
Hitachi HTS542525K9SA00 250GB
193GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 50.9
Write 37
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 40.8
48% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
51% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D4U2133M/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.3% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 20.1
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 18.2
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,745 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H110-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $370
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback