Gigabyte GA-A520M S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M S2H  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 28 '22 at 04:56
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User SLV-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 121
2-Core 209
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 568
57% 464 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 65 120 62 79 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 473
Write 300
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 100
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 37.3
116% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 195
167% 242 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB-$71
190GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 74 74 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
41% Average
Read 69.4
Write 79.1
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 73.1
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41%
Great: 62%
Toshiba MK3276GSX 320GB-$12
63GB free
Firmware: GS001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 54 54 53 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 42.4
Write 42.9
Mixed 16.1
SusWrite 53.9
28% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905713-030.A00G 9905713-035.A00G 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.7% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 21.5
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 20.9
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A520M S2H Builds (Compare 1,152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $153
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback