Emaxx EMX-A55GM-iCafe

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardEmaxx EMX-A55GM-iCafe  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111117
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 28 '22 at 04:56
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3500 APU-$60
P0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Memory 52
1-Core 34.3
2-Core 67.4
33% 51.2 Pts
4-Core 89.4
8-Core 85.2
12% 87.3 Pts
64-Core 86
5% 86 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 128B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 4
Splatting 5
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 17 10 43 79 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 96.6
Write 105
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 48.4
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$49
29GB free
Firmware: 4.ADA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 55 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 54.2
Write 62.8
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 53.9
39% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.5% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 6.9
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EMX-A55GM-iCafe Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Emaxx EMX-A55GM-iCafe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback