Gigabyte GA-AORUS 15P XD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive420% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AORUS 15P XD  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211007
Uptime12.7 Days
Run DateSep 28 '22 at 04:28
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 158
2-Core 312
99% 184 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 971
94% 770 Pts
64-Core 1,295
80% 1,295 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Gigabyte(1458 1531) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 197
Parallax 118
112% 151 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 123
Splatting 119
115% 144 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 111%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SM2P43A8-001TC 1TB
710GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.B.M1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3450 4028 3810 4410 2740 1125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
420% Outstanding
Read 2,161
Write 4,478
Mixed 2,368
SusWrite 3,261
698% 3,067 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 65.5
289% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,241
DQ Write 910
DQ Mixed 1,048
791% 1,066 MB/s
Poor: 244%
This bench: 420%
Great: 523%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 234140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2397 2404 2436 2435 2432 2427 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
392% Outstanding
Read 2,305
Write 2,458
Mixed 2,161
SusWrite 2,422
528% 2,337 MB/s
4K Read 59.6
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 81.3
290% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,636
DQ Write 1,203
DQ Mixed 1343
1,024% 1,394 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 392%
Great: 469%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FRS 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 31
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 18.9
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AORUS 15P XD Builds (Compare 762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AORUS 15P XD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback