Acer Aspire M1935

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire M1935  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer IPIMB-AR
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121018
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 27 '22 at 15:30
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$187
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 180
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 448
47% 376 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 370X
AMD(1002 0310) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1147 MHz, MLim: 1249 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.10.01.03
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 17.6
1% 11.5 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 11.2
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Emtec X150 120GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 198 228 190 92 112 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53% Above average
Read 239
Write 210
Mixed 222
SusWrite 168
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 20.3
84% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 38.5
66% 128 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53%
Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ02ABF050H 500GB
396GB free
Firmware: HDF01D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 106 107 105 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 101
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 106
61% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M1935 Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M1935

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback