Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '22 at 04:45
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5650
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 96.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 201
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 584
62% 494 Pts
64-Core 702
43% 702 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 370X
AMD(1002 0310) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.3.2
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 34.6
Parallax 39.7
22% 33.9 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 30.2
Splatting 22.9
22% 27.2 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 46 51 50 49 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 156
Write 53.1
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 49
18% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 22.4
82% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.8
DQ Write 52.4
DQ Mixed 28.7
24% 35 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
297GB free
Firmware: MS2OA810
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 109 119 117 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 69.6
Write 86.9
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 104
53% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
40.3% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 10.6
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11.4
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 51.9
77% 51.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback