Asus VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop X407UF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop X407UF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X407UF
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 27 '22 at 04:33
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7020U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 104
51% 79.6 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 165
21% 161 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX130
Asus(1043 19FE) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
7.58% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 9.5
8% 11 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 12.8
Splatting 0.1
6% 8.13 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.58%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen09sm21ar256sdkm2 256GB 256GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0503A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 122 30 12 118 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 416
Write 379
Mixed 346
SusWrite 84.7
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 20.7
88% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 52.4
78% 142 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
918GB free
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 128 125 125 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 68.5
Write 117
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 126
69% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
186% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 0A94 D4S4GS24A8 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.8% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 18.5
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 12.1
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop X407UF Builds (Compare 249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop X407UF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback