Asus Rampage III Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 167%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics216% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Rampage III Formula  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '22 at 00:53
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5675
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 177
73% 122 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 605
59% 485 Pts
64-Core 722
45% 722 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,095
Device(1B4C 1454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
216% Outstanding
Lighting 316
Reflection 304
Parallax 359
257% 326 fps
MRender 380
Gravity 275
Splatting 194
221% 283 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 216%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 122 124 123 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 357
Write 219
Mixed 166
SusWrite 122
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 27.4
100% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 117
109% 170 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 89%
Team T253A3001T 1TB
322GB free
Firmware: U0503A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 118 118 118 119 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 366
Write 208
Mixed 243
SusWrite 118
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 25.1
102% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 50.6
73% 137 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 102%
WL4000GSA6472 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: WD04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 122 125 125 126 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 137
Write 146
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 124
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 122 122 125 124 124 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
626GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 100 96 101 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 91.6
Write 71.2
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 100
61% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
49% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 106%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 102 103 103 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 97.9
Write 99.3
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 101
71% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
975GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 72 71 71 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 86.9
Write 90.2
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 70
62% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 103 106 105 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 113
Write 99.9
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 103
71% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.5
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 13.2
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 59.3
68% 59.3 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage III Formula Builds (Compare 304 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Rampage III Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback