PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Digibras H61H2-M17 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Digiboard H61H2-M17 |
Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140123 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Sep 26 '22 at 19:33 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
59.9%
Above average
|
63% 108 Pts
|
32% 241 Pts
|
16% 265 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.40
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.6%
Average
|
44% 56.2 fps
|
37% 45.4 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston A400 240GB-$28
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 189 170 181 222 201 MB/s
|
39.2%
Below average
|
34% 152 MB/s
|
64% 21.1 MB/s
|
28% 37.8 MB/s
|
![]() Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
489GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 133 143 133 145 134 MB/s
|
80.5%
Excellent
|
80% 111 MB/s
|
141% 1 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston 99U5403-159.A01LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.8%
Average
|
49% 17 GB/s
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
48% 83.1 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i3-2130Intel $50Bench 57%, 6,759 samples | 10x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 2x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 2x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 5x |
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples | 4x |
HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 8,807 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $78 |