Digibras NM70-I

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDigibras NM70-I  (all builds)
MotherboardDigiboard NM70-I
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121130
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 26 '22 at 17:52
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 847-$259
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Memory 38.5
1-Core 9.2
2-Core 17.3
17% 21.7 Pts
4-Core 23.5
8-Core 32.4
4% 28 Pts
64-Core 30.4
2% 30.4 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 2111) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.15% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 1
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 1.2
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.15%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 58 60 40 43 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 49.9
Write 53.1
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 48.3
32% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 47%
SanDisk' Cruzer Fit 32GB
23GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 7.8 11 9.9 9.7 9.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 58.8
Write 14.5
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 9.7
27% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF150B.M16 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 3.1
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 3.8
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 12%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NM70-I Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Digibras NM70-I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback