Lenovo 90A3A9P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemLenovo 90A3A9P  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '22 at 16:21
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 136
60% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 189
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 220
PwrHis(1787 5220) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Afox SD250-120GN 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V84M2c31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 210 121 39 39 36 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.1% Average
Read 231
Write 192
Mixed 204
SusWrite 107
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 23.7
81% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 79.7
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 118
95% 130 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
460GB free
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 127 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 130
Write 125
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 128
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HB3DU004GFM8MML16 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90A3A9P Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 90A3A9P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback